McKinzy, Sr. v. Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement et al
| Michael E. McKinzy, Sr. |
| Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement, Christine T. Rogers, Robert M. Schieber, Patrick Campbell, Mike Dyer, Aaron M. Seamans, Richard E. Dorr, Charles Bender and Fernando Gaitan |
| 2:2010cv02015 |
| January 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John W. Lungstrum |
| Gerald L. Rushfelt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The motions to dismiss by defendants Dorr and Gaitan 25 ; Scheiber, Campbell and Sill-Rogers 29 ; Bender, Dyer and Seamands 32 and the Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement 9 are granted and the complaint is dismi ssed without prejudice as it relates to Jackson County Circuit Court of Missouri. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 13 and 14 is denied. This renders as moot 7 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgme nt and defendant Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement's 11 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to summary judgment motion. This action in its entirety is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 06/01/2010. (ses)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
