Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. v. McMillin Group, LLC et al
| Vision Marketing Resources, Inc. |
| McMillin Group, LLC and James L. McMillin |
| 2:2010cv02252 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Allen |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting in its entirety the 62 Report and Recommendations. Further, sustaining plaintiff's 31 Request for Charging Order. The Court contemporaneously files with this order a charging order substantially in the form of Attachment A to the 62 Report AndRecommendation. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 07/15/2015. (mg)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling Plaintiff's 54 Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendations; adopting Judge James' 48 Report and Recommendations; and overruling Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Judgment against Garnishee. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 07/14/2015. (mg)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Plaintiff's Application (Motion) for Examination of Judgment Debtor. Any future application shall explain why other post-judgment discovery is not satisfactory or contain other reasons justifying setting a subsequent hearing in aid of execution that requires Mr. McMillin to travel from Georgia to Kansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 4/24/2015. (byk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
