Sosna v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: William F. Sosna
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2010cv02374
Filed: July 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Richard D. Rogers
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 14 plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint.; and denying 22 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/21/2011. (mss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sosna v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William F. Sosna
Represented By: Larry A. Pittman, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?