Bettis et al v. Hall et al
| Tony Bettis, Eric Comeau, Stephen Seat and National Realty Capital, LLC |
| Gary L. Hall, Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC and Gary L. Hall Revocable Trust U/T/A/ Dated 11/16/89, The |
| 2:2010cv02457 |
| August 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Julie A. Robinson |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
ORDER granting 211 plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 03/19/2015. (mb)
|
|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 150 Defendants' Joint Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for New trial; denying 151 Plaintiffs' Motion for New Trial on Issue of Damages. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 6/28/2012. (pp)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 88 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 2/14/2012. (pp)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part defendant Bentley and Trust's 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 10 defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss. See Memorandum and Order for details. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 4/14/2011. (pp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
