Morris v. Cabela's
Plaintiff: Kenneth E. Morris, Jr.
Defendant: Cabela's
Case Number: 2:2010cv02559
Filed: October 14, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Wyandotte
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Presiding Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 103 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 2/7/2013.Mailed to pro se Plaintiff Morris (3007 N. 76th Street, Kansas City, 66109) by regular mail (jh)
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 10/19/2011.Mailed to pro se party Kenneth E. Morris, Jr. by regular mail (cm)
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 8/31/2011. Mailed to pro se party Kenneth E. Morris, Jr. by regular mail. (aa)
June 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel a Discovery Response. To the extent that Plaintiff is seeking to compel Defendant to produce video recordings during the months of January and February, 2010, from the camera(s) overlooking the door for which Plaintiff set off the alarm, that request is denied based upon Defendant's representation that no video exists. The Court grants the request by Plaintiff to inspect the premises of Defend ant, as sought by his request. Defendant shall make its premises in Kansas City, Kansas, at the location where Plaintiff was previously employed, available for such inspection, photographing, and video recording at a date and time to which the parti es may agree, and to be completed by August 1, 2011, or at such later time to which the parties may agree. To minimize the risk of disruption to Defendant's business, the area to be inspected shall be limited to the areas where Plaintiff allege dly opened an alarmed door to go outside to smoke and where he alleges that employees go when on break. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 6/23/2011. (A copy of the Memorandum and Order mailed to pro se plaintiff by regular mail on 6/23/2011.) (byk)
May 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 5/17/2011.(Copy of Order mailed to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail on 5/17/2011.) (byk)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 45 Plaintiff's Motion to Unseal the Transcript 30 Days From March 11, 2011 of the Videotaped Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 5/13/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Plaintiff by regular mail on 5/13/2011.) (byk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Cabela's
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth E. Morris, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cabela's
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?