Fairfax Portfolio, LLC v. Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Plaintiff: Fairfax Portfolio, LLC
Defendant: Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Counter_claimant: Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Counter_defendant: Fairfax Portfolio, LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv02007
Filed: January 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Kenneth G. Gale
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 46 Defendant's Statement of Consultation, Request for Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees, and Memorandum in Support of Request. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff pay defendant $16,872.63 in attorney's fees. Defendant may submit its Bill of Costs and memorandum in support according to the procedures set forth in D. Kan. Rule 54.1. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/3/2012. (jw)
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to Plaintiff's Position; denying 31 defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim and Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant's Counterclaim; denying 33 plaintiff's Motion to Certify Question of Law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff show cause why it should be permitted to pursue a "constructive holdover" theory at trial. Plaintiff's brief must be filed by Friday, March 3, 2012, and shall not exceed eight (8) pages. Defendant's response shall be due no later than fourteen (14) days after plaintiff's brief is filed, and shall not exceed eight (8) pages. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be due no later than fourteen (14) days after defendant's response is filed, and shall not exceed four (4) pages. See Memorandum and Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 1/17/2012. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fairfax Portfolio, LLC v. Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Represented By: J. Nick Badgerow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Fairfax Portfolio, LLC
Represented By: Paul P. Hasty, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fairfax Portfolio, LLC
Represented By: Paul P. Hasty, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Represented By: J. Nick Badgerow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?