Teran v. GB International S.P.A. et al
| Carlos Teran |
| GB International S.P.A., GB Miami S.R.L. and GB Italy |
| 2:2011cv02236 |
| April 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Julie A. Robinson |
| David J. Waxse |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 124 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court directs further briefing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)(2). Accordingly, Teran is directed to file a sur-reply, no later than fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order, stating why summary judgment should not be granted to Defendant GB Miami with respect to Teran's affirmative defenses to its counterclaim; Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of Teran's submission to file a sur-response. In the interim, the case shall be removed from the April 6, 2015 trial calendar, pending review of the supplemental submissions. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/16/15. (kao)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 87 Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff is hereby directed to electronically file the Second Amended Complaint forthwith. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 7/26/2013. (meh)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 81 Motion to Quash and to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 7/19/2013. (bt)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as follows: 1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is DENIED; 2)Defendants 9; Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's tort claims set forth in Counts I and II, are DISMISSED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's breach of Shareholders Agreement claim set forth in Co unt V related to Defendants' exercise of the Call Right is DENIED; Plaintiff's breach of Shareholders Agreement claim related to Section 1.3(b) of the Agreement is DISMISSED without prejudice to seek leave to amend. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/29/2013. (pp)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff shall electronically file his Amended Complaint forthwith. See Memorandum and Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 4/25/2012. (bw)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Jurisdictional Discovery Before Responding to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and granting Plaintiff's Request for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defen dants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint; denying without prejudice 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) Scheduling Conference; and granting in part and denying in part 22 Defendants' Motion to Stay Disc overy. Plaintiff is given until 1/18/2012 for completion of jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiff is granted until 10 days after personal jurisdiction discovery is completed to either file his Response to the Motion to Dismiss Complaint, or to seek l eave to file an Amended Complaint based on information learned through personal jurisdiction discovery. All discovery in this case, except for personal jurisdiction discovery, is stayed until such time as the Court rules on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 10/20/2011. (aam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
