Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sprint Communications Company, LP
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, TWC Communications, LLC and Time Warner Cable Information Services (Kansas), LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv02686
Filed: December 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 529 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that defendants' motion for review of the Clerk's taxation of costs 523 is hereby granted in part and denied in part, as set forth herein. Costs shall be taxed against defendants in favor of plaintiff in the total amount of $1,040,845.95. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/3/2019. (ses)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 521 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 504 Sprint's Motion For An Order Enforcing Judgment. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/2/2019. (as)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 495 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that defendants' posttrial motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) or for a new trial 485 is denied. It is further ordered that plaintiff's motion for an amendment of the judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, to add an award of prejudgment interest 483 is hereby granted in part. The Court awards prejudgment interest to plaintiff in the amount of $6,183,548.00, and the Court will issue an amended judgment accordingly. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 05/30/2017. (ses)
November 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER memorializing rulings made during November 14, 2014 status conference regarding representation of Craig Cowden. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/14/2014. (ah)
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that certain terms in the patents at issue in this action are construed as set forth herein.Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/09/2014. (ses)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 68 motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/16/2013. (ah)
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 39 defendants' Motion to Transfer Case; and denying as moot 49 defendants' Motion to Sever and Stay. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/18/2013. (mss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sprint Communications Company, LP
Represented By: Eric A. Buresh
Represented By: Paul R. Hart
Represented By: Jason R. Mudd
Represented By: Adam P. Seitz
Represented By: Basil Trent Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc.
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable LLC
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TWC Communications, LLC
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Information Services (Kansas), LLC
Represented By: Terrence J. Campbell
Represented By: Catherine C. Theisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?