Jackson-Holmes v. U.S. Postmaster General
Plaintiff: Lashonda Jackson-Holmes
Defendant: U.S. Postmaster General
Case Number: 2:2012cv02047
Filed: January 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Presiding Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 3/13/2013.Mailed to pro se party Lashonda Jackson-Holmes by regular mail. (aa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson-Holmes v. U.S. Postmaster General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lashonda Jackson-Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Postmaster General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?