Dyer v. USD 500 et al
| Mozella M. Dyer |
| Cynthia Lane, Jill Shackleford, Jayson Strickland, USD 500, Edwin Hudson, Barbara Kirkegaard, Sherry Samples, Steve Vaughn, John D. Rios, Joe Five and John Lee |
| 2:2012cv02081 |
| February 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Johnson |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 173 plaintiff's Motion to Review Costs. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 10/29/14. Mailed to pro se party Mozella Dyer by regular mail. (mss)
|
|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 145 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 147 defendant Mather's Motion to Dismiss. All claims of the plaintiff are hereby dismissed. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 6/24/2013. (mss)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER.The court enters the parties' stipulated protective order but has deleted proposed Paragraph 1(d) to conform to Guideline 2 of the Guidelines for Agreed Protective Orders for the District of Kansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/25/2012. (ah)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 14 plaintiff's Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 4/13/2012. (mss) Modified on 4/13/2012 to correct that no parties were notified by mail as everyone is set up to receive electronic notification (aa).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
