Gunze Plastics Engineering Corporation of America v. Landmark Technology, LLC

Defendant: Landmark Technology, LLC
Plaintiff: Gunze Plastics Engineering Corporation of America
Case Number: 2:2012cv02297
Filed: May 18, 2012
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Referring Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 10, 2012 18 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/10/2012. (mss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gunze Plastics Engineering Corporation of America v. Landmark Technology, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark Technology, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gunze Plastics Engineering Corporation of America
Represented By: Robert C. Garrison
Represented By: Travis W. McCallon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?