BHC Development, LC et al v. Bally Gaming, Inc
| BHC Development, LC and BHCMC, LLC |
| Bally Gaming, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv02393 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Shawnee |
| Gerald L. Rushfelt |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER finding as moot 199 Motion for Order; denying 201 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/9/2014. (kg)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER denying 175 defendant's motion to compel an election of remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 02/25/2014. (mb)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER denying 86 defendant's motion to strike, denying 118 plaintiffs' motion to exclude, and granting in part and denying part 136 plaintiffs' motion in limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/10/2014. (mb)
|
|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 158 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 1/7/2014. (mm)
|
|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's 83 Motion For Summary Judgment filed July 15, 2013, be and hereby is sustained as to plaintiffs' fraudulent inducement claim (Count III) and breach of express warranty claim (Count IV). The Court further finds that plaintiffs' damages on their contract claim are limited to $281,135.00. Further, overruling as to plaintiffs' breach of contract claim (Count I), negligent misrepresentation claim (Count II) and breach of implied warranty claim (Count V). Further, that Defendant's 83 Motion For Summary Judgment filed July 15, 2013, be and hereby is overrulled as to its counterclaim for breach of contract. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 12/4/2013. (mg)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 38 Motion to Compel Discovery. Excluding work product and attorney-client privileged documents, Plaintiffs shall, within twenty-eight days of the date of this order, produce all documents showing or discussing the sear ch conducted by them for the selection of replacement software. This production shall be undertaken consistent with the agreement set out in 54 Agreed Motion to Stay. An award of expenses or fees is inappropriate under the circumstances. Each pa rty shall bear its own attorney fees and expenses incurred in connection with the motion to compel. It is further ordered that, consistent with 56 Order of April 11, 2013, the stay on the briefing on 49 Konami Gaming, Inc.s Motion for Leave to I ntervene and Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Compel is hereby lifted. Briefing on that motion will re-commence fourteen days after the production ordered herein. If no response to that motion is filed within that time-period, the Court may find the motion moot without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 5/9/2013. (bw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
