Cox v. (LNU) et al
| Nicholas A. Cox |
| Ann (LNU), Valerie Rethaford, Frank Denning, (FNU) Pattism and Correct Care Solutions, LLC |
| 2:2012cv02678 |
| October 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Johnson |
| Gerald L. Rushfelt |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
257
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant John Doe without prejudice for failure to effect timely service. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 3/19/2015. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail. (hs)
|
|
Filing
256
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 205 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 216 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 221 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 234 Motion to Modify; denying 251 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff shall show cause in writing to this Court no later than March 16, 2015, why plaintiff's claims against defendant Nurse John Doe should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If he does not show sufficient cause, the Court will dismiss these claims without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 02/27/2015. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail. (mig)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER denying recusal as requested in ECF 251 . See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on December 18, 2014. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail. (gc)
|
|
Filing
250
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 235 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 241 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The Court upon its own motion grants Plaintiff 21 days from the date of this order to respond to Defendant Keith Patt ison, D.O.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 216) and CCS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 221). See Memorandum and Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 11/18/2014. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail with a copy of D. Kan. Local Rules. (gc)
|
|
Filing
215
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 186 Motion for Reconsideration and affirming 182 the Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 06/12/2014. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail (mig)
|
|
Filing
182
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 148 Sealed Motion for Screening Panels, or in the Alternative, Motion for Expert Witnesses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 3/14/2014. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail. (gc)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 171 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 2/27/2014. Mailed to pro se party Nicholas A. Cox by regular mail. (gc)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 97 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 1/6/2014. (mh)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 59 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 73 Defendants Correct Care Solutions, LLC; Nurse Ann; and Nurse Valerie Rethaford Motion for Protective Order; and granting in part and denying in part 76 D efendants [sic] Motion for Protective Order. The Court will separately enter an appropriate order to protect the confidentiality of certain categories of documents produced in discovery in this case and to reduce the security risks associated with p roviding unrestricted access to jail records, policies, and procedures to inmates and detainees. See Memorandum and Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 6/27/2013. (Mailed to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail.) (bw)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 77 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; denying 78 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; and denying as moot 85 Plaintiffs Request for Defendant Keith Pattison to Answer Petition, which has been filed and docketed as a motion. Plaintiff is granted leave to prosecute this action in forma pauperis. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order, the Court denies the motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a similar motion, if he survives summary dismissal. It denies the last motion as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 5/30/2013. (Mailed to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail.) (bw)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 27 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to electronically file the Amended Complaint that is attached as Exhibit A to the motion. See Memorandum and Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 4/4/2013. (Mailed to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail.) (bw)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 22 Motion to Compel Cited Case Law; denying 32 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; and denying 39 Defendant Sheriff's Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply in Support o f his Motion to Compel Case Law. The Court denies the motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a similar motion, if he survives summary dismissal. If the case proceeds to trial, furthermore, the Court may on its own mot ion reconsider if circumstances warrant a request for counsel to represent Plaintiff at that time. See Memorandum and Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 2/14/2013.(Mailed to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail.) (bw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
