Mabone v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer L.L.P. et al
| Ralph G. Mabone |
| Dolly Pearl Evans, UNUM Group Corporation, Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer LLP and William S. Towles, III |
| 2:2012cv02794 |
| December 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| David J. Waxse |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying defendant Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP's 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Proper Service of Process. Further, plaintiff Yarbary's service of summons against Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP is quashed. Plaintiff Yarbary has until 04/24/2013 to properly serve Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP. If plaintiff Yarbary fails to properly serve defendant by that time, plaintiff faces possible dismissal of the action again st defendant MPOWB without prejudice. Plaintiff Mabone's service of summons against Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP is quashed. Plaintiff Mabone has until 04/24/2013 to properly serve Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP. If plaintiff Mabone fails to properly serve defendant by that time, plaintiff faces possible dismissal of the action against defendant MPOWB without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 4/10/2013. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
