Career Destination Development, LLC v. Indeed, Inc.

Plaintiff: Career Destination Development, LLC
Defendant: Indeed, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv02486
Filed: September 17, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: John W. Lungstrum
Referring Judge: James P. O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 21 defendant's motion to stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/11/2014. (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Career Destination Development, LLC v. Indeed, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Career Destination Development, LLC
Represented By: David Marcus(Designation Retained)
Represented By: James J. Kernell(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indeed, Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer B. Wieland
Represented By: Ryan C. Hudson
Represented By: James L. Eisenbrandt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.