Wanjiku v. Johnson County, Kansas et al
| Erick Gachuhi Wanjiku |
| Lenexa Police Department, Johnson County, Kansas and Steve Grigsby |
| 2:2014cv02001 |
| January 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Richard D. Rogers |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: the motion to dismiss of defendant Johnson County, Kansas (Doc. # 11 ) be hereby granted. The court shall dismiss plaintiff's claims against this defendant without prejudice for insufficiency of service ofprocess. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 6/10/14. Mailed to pro se party Erick Gachuhi Wanjiku by regular mail. (meh)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to defendants Lenexa Police Dept and Steve Grigsby. The court hereby dismisses plaintiff's claim against defendant Lenexa Police Department for failure to stat e a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court further hereby dismisses plaintiff's claim against defendant Steve Grisgby without prejudice for insufficiency of service of process. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 2/28/14.Mailed to pro se party Erick Gachuhi Wanhiku by regular mail (meh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
