Corozzo v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joshua Corozzo
Defendant: J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv02081
Filed: February 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 J.C. Penney's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 6/11/14. (mss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Corozzo v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Represented By: Jack D. Rowe
Represented By: Angela M. Tsevis
Represented By: Brian N. Woolley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Corozzo
Represented By: Jayson A. Watkins
Represented By: Charles Jason Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?