Mochama v. Butler County et al
| Justine Osoro Mochama |
| Butler County, Kansas, Butler County Sheriff, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Does 1-5 |
| 2:2014cv02121 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Butler |
| Teresa J. James |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Civil Rights |
| 28:2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants Rodney Nichols and Timothy Zwetoware entitled to summary judgment on their contention that they are entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim that they violated his Fourth a nd Fifth Amendment rights when they used excessive force at the Butler County Detention Center (part of Count I). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Rodney Nichols is entitled to summaryjudgment on plaintiff's claims that he violated plaintiff 's Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights when he failed to intervene at the Butler County Detention Center (part of Count II).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for defendants on allclaims in this case. See Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 2/27/2017. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruled in part and sustained in part 74 Motion to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS SPECIFICALLY ORDERED that Alan Van Skike, Jane Patty-Kill and Andrew Pleviak are entitled to summary judgm ent on plaintiff's claims that they violated his Fourth and FifthAmendment rights when they (a) used excessive force at the Wichita ICE Office (part of Count I) and (b) and failed to intervene at the Wichita ICE Office (part of Count II). See order for further details. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 1/3/17. (hw)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling as moot the 39 Motion to Dismiss the United States of America. Further, overruling the Federal Defendants' 42 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion For Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 06/22/2015. (mg)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 53 Plaintiff's second Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall electronically file his proposed Third Amended Complaint within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 5/29/2015. (byk)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall electronically file his proposed Second Amended Complaint within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. It is further ordered that Plai ntiff shall serve summons and his Second Amended Complaint upon the newly added defendants within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. It is further ordered that the Butler Defendants' request for a formal dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 is granted. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) stipulation of dismissal of his claims against the Butler Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 7/31/2014. (byk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
