Kocsis v. Sedgwick County, Kansas et al
| Bradley Kocsis |
| Sedgwick County, Kansas, David E Kendall, Robert Hinshaw and Jeff Easter |
| 2:2014cv02167 |
| April 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Leavenworth |
| Carlos Murguia |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is granted with respect to plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; it is denied with respect to plaintiff's claim(s) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and plaintiff's request for exemplary damages. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 6/17/15. (hw)
|
|
Filing
68
AGREED ORDER for production of health records. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/27/2015. (ah)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or to Strike; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 27 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint within ten days of this order. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 11/19/14. (kao)
|
|
Filing
37
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the protective order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/19/2014. (ah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
