Columbian Financial Corporation et al v. Stork et al
Columbian Financial Corporation and The Columbian Bank & Trust Company |
Judi M. Stork, Deryl K. Schuster, Office of the State Bank of Commissioner of Kansas, Edwin G. Splichal and J. Thomas Thull |
2:2014cv02168 |
April 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Shawnee |
Sam A. Crow |
K. Gary Sebelius |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 104 Motion for Summary Judgment or in the alternative, judgment on the pleadings. It is Further Ordered that 121 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/17/2018. (ht) |
Filing 129 ORDER denying 119 Motion to Stay Enforcement of Orders. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's pending discovery within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/2/2018. (wh) |
Filing 115 ORDER denying 106 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 1/5/2018. (wh) |
Filing 101 ORDER granting 95 Motion for Substitution of Parties. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/13/2017. (wh) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/18/14. (msb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.