Keener et al v. Kobach
Plaintiff: Parker Bednasek
Defendant: Kris W. Kobach
Amicus: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc., The
Case Number: 2:2015cv09300
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Julie A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 255 ORDER denying 245 Motion for an Order of Referral to Mediation. The parties shall meet and confer by no later than June 4, 2021, as described in this Order. Following the parties' consultation, Plaintiff shall immediately file a statement of consultation containing all of the information required by D. Kan. R. 54.2(d). Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 5/25/2021. (hw)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 240 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 238 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 236 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses Incurred. Response deadline 3/15/2021. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 2/22/2021. (kas)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 219 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 6/18/2018. (bw)
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 189 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part, and taking under advisement in part 183 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony, and Survey of Patrick McFerron. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion to exclude, grants the motion to strike his deposition designation, and takes under advisement Plaintiff's objection to the admissibility of the survey. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 2/27/18. (kao)
May 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 165 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 141 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT that the June 5, 2017 trial date in this matter is continued. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge Julie A. Robinson on 5/4/2017. (hl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keener et al v. Kobach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kris W. Kobach
Represented By: Kris Kobach
Represented By: Garrett Robert Roe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc., The
Represented By: J. Christian Adams
Represented By: Kaylan Phillips
Represented By: Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parker Bednasek
Represented By: Paul Treanor Davis
Represented By: Mark P. Johnson
Represented By: Jennifer M. Walrath
Represented By: Samantha Jo Wenger
Represented By: Curtis E. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?