Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
| Digital Ally, Inc. |
| Taser International, Inc. |
| Taser International, Inc. |
| Digital Ally, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv02032 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Johnson |
| Teresa J. James |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 272 Sealed Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 10/30/2018. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
268
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff's request for production of working samples of Defendant's products is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's request to amend its invalidity contentions is under advisement pending further briefing by the parties. The parties shall submit their briefing, not to exceed five pages, to chambers by October 15, 2018 at 8 a.m. The expert report deadline is extended to October 23, 2018. The rebuttal expert report deadline is extended to November 21, 2018. Parties shall serve responses to written deposition questions relating to their source code productions by October 19, 2018. Should any disputes or objections arise, the parties shall submit in writin g a brief summary of the disputes to the Court by October 24, 2018. Plaintiff may delay responding to any questions related to Defendant's proposed amended invalidity contentions until after the Court rules on that issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 10/12/2018. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
259
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 216 Taser International, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Digital Ally, Inc's Revised Rule 30(b)(6) Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 9/21/2018. (mn)
|
|
Filing
253
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 211 Defendant's Motion to Compel ESI Discovery. The Court sustains Plaintiff's overbreadth objections to certain search-term combinations in Defendant's ESI Requests 2 through 5. Within thirty (30) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce all ESI responsive to Defendant's Second Set of Requests for E-Mail Production, as limited by the Court herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 9/11/2018. (byk)
|
|
Filing
204
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that certain terms in the patent at issue are construed. Please see order for additional information. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 7/19/2018. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 132 Motion for Leave to Amend, Motion to Dismiss the '292 Patent with Prejudice, and Motion to Dismiss the '292 Patent Counterclaim. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 3/5/2018. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 152 Defendant TASER International, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to to Amend Invalidity Contentions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 3/2/2018. (ck)
|
|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Defendant's request to continue stay of this case with respect to the '452 patent. A Scheduling/Status Conference is set for 12/19/2017 at 10:30 AM(central time) before Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James a nd will be held by telephone. Participating counsel must dial 1-888-363-4749 and enter Access Code 4901386 to join the teleconference. The parties' proposals regarding how the '452 patent litigation should proceed, with suggested deadlines, due 12/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/17/2017. (byk)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 108 Defendant's Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review of the Asserted Patents. This case and all deadlines set forth in 73 Second Patent Scheduling Order, including the 3/28/2017 M arkman claim construction hearing before District Judge Murguia, are temporarily stayed until the PTAB issues its initial decision(s) whether to institute an inter partes review of the '292 and '452 patents. It is further ordered tha t the parties shall file a joint report advising the Court of the PTAB's decision(s) on Defendant's petitions, as well as the parties' respective positions as to further proceedings in this case, within fourteen (14) days of the PTAB's initial decision on each of Defendant's pending petitions for inter partes review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 3/20/2017. (byk)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss. (Counts III-VIII are dismissed.) Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 1/12/2017. (ydm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
