Foster v. USIC Locating Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Randall W. Foster
Defendant: USIC Locating Services, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02174
Filed: March 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 225 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 213 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 7/30/2019. (heo)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 191 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 169 MOTION for Reconsideration regarding 168 Order on Motion to Exclude Rebuttal Expert Boyd Smith is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 9/6/2018. (jsh)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 185 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 166 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/31/2018. (hl)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 168 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 111 Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Boyd Smith. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/17/18. (hw)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 162 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 109 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Bernard Abrams. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/10/2018. (hl)
August 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 159 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Michael Dreiling and Dr. Gary Baker. Defendant's motion seeking exclusion of expert opinions of plaintiff's future lost income is granted. Defendant's motion as to loss of household services is denied. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/7/2018. (hl)
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 154 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion as to loss of consortium and punitive damages is granted. The motion as to the theory of liability based on the expert testimony of Boyd Smith is granted. The motion as to the issue of future lost income based on the expert testimony of Michael Dreiling and Dr. Gary Baker is granted. The motion is denied as to any issues related to the medical opinion of Dr. Bernard Adams and as to claims for lost value of household services based on the expert testimony of Dr. Gary Baker. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 7/25/2018. (hl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foster v. USIC Locating Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall W. Foster
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Herbert
Represented By: Pedro L. Irigonegaray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USIC Locating Services, LLC
Represented By: Stephen J. Moore
Represented By: Christopher S. Shank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?