Gilmore v. L.D. Drilling, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey T Gilmore
Defendant: L.D. Drilling, Inc. and Mark Davis
Case Number: 2:2016cv02416
Filed: June 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Barton
Presiding Judge: Teresa J. James
Presiding Judge: Julie A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count III (Docs. 65, 85) are granted with respect to the statement made to the Kansas Department of Labor; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are granted in part a nd denied in part with respect to sufficiency of Count III; within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his Complaint to identify the third parties to whom the allegedly defamatory statements were made; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 57) is denied as moot. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 11/29/17. (kao)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 79 Defendants L.D. Drilling, Inc. and Mark Davis' First Motion to Compel Discovery. No later than 8/11/2017, Plaintiff shall file a motion setting forth amount he requests in sanctions. Defendants shall have until 8/25/2017 to respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 7/21/2017. (ts)
June 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Plaintiff Jeffrey T. Gilmore's First Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 6/6/2017. (ts)
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 36 Plaintiff Gilmore's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve his Second Amended Complaint on existing Defendants within ten (10) days of the date of this order, and shall serve summons and Second Amended Complaint on newly added Defendants within thirty (30) days of filing the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 5/2/2017. (ts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilmore v. L.D. Drilling, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey T Gilmore
Represented By: Matthew J. Gist
Represented By: Christopher M. Napolitano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L.D. Drilling, Inc.
Represented By: Derek S. Casey
Represented By: Eric B. Metz
Represented By: Shane A. Rosson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Davis
Represented By: Derek S. Casey
Represented By: Eric B. Metz
Represented By: Shane A. Rosson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?