Ericson v. Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC
Plaintiff: John A. Ericson
Defendant: Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv02087
Filed: February 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Daniel D. Crabtree
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/13/17. (bh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ericson v. Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John A. Ericson
Represented By: Bryce B. Bell
Represented By: Ashley Scott Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landers McLarty Olathe KS, LLC
Represented By: Jacob L. Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?