Hirt et al v. Unified School District No. 287 et al
Plaintiff: |
Gene Hirt and Eric S. Clark |
Defendant: |
Unified School District No. 287, Curt Altic, Rusty Ecord, Blaine Flory, Matt Froggatte, Ryan Sink and Jerry Turner |
Case Number: |
2:2017cv02279 |
Filed: |
May 16, 2017 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Office: |
Kansas City Office |
County: |
Franklin |
Presiding Judge: |
Julie A Robinson |
Presiding Judge: |
Gerald L. Rushfelt |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 24, 2019 |
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 142 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 147 Motion for Summary Judgment. Status Conference set for 5/22/2019 @ 1:00 PM before District Judge Holly L. Teeter. See order for further details. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 4/24/19.Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt & Eric S. Clark by regular mail. (msb)
|
December 18, 2018 |
Filing
146
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 125 Motion for Review and denying 140 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 12/18/18. Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt & Eric S. Clark by regular mail (msb)
|
December 4, 2018 |
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 112 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 12/4/18. Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt & Eric S. Clark by regular mail (msb)
|
August 30, 2018 |
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Answers. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 8/30/18. Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt and Eric S. Clark by regular mail. (rel)
|
July 20, 2018 |
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion to Compel. The Court also finds that an abbreviated briefing schedule is appropriate regarding Plaintiffs' recently filed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Answers [12 0]. The Court therefore orders that Defendants shall have until July 27, 2018 to respond to the Motion and that no reply by Plaintiffs will be allowed. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 7/20/18. Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt & Eric S. Clark by regular mail. (rel)
|
April 3, 2018 |
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 45 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; denying 58 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 74 Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers and Objections. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS AND DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 4/3/18. Mailed to pro se parties Gene Hirt & Eric S. Clark by regular mail. (adc)
|
December 28, 2017 |
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 43 Motion for Reconsideration. See Order for details. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 12/28/17. Mailed to pro se party Eric S. Clark and Gene Hirt by regular mail. (kao)
|
October 23, 2017 |
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 10/23/2017.Mailed to pro se party Gene Hirt and Eric S. Clark by regular mail. (cv)
|
June 21, 2017 |
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 7/5/2017. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 6/21/2017. Mailed to pro se party Gene Hirt and Eric Clark by regular and certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7012 3460 0000 8262 7204 (Eric Clark) and 7012 3460 0000 8262 7211 (Gene Hirt). (hl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?