Stovall v. Brooklyn Barbeque Corporation et al
| Gladys M. Stovall |
| Vincent Martin and Brooklyn Barbeque Corporation |
| 2:2017cv02412 |
| July 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| John W. Lungstrum |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 132 plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the statutory fee provisions of Title VII and the ADA and the court awards plaintiff $157,998.75 in fees and $5458.50 in costs. The clerk of the court shall amend the judgment to reflect the court's award of attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 01/09/2020. (ses)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 81 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/17/2019. (ses)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 73 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 03/04/2019. (jc)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/7/2019. (amh)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 26 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/27/2018. (ses)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
