Crawford v. United States Marshals Service et al
United States Marshals Service and Ronald L. Miller |
Tommie Perris Crawford |
2:2018cv02003 |
January 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Leavenworth |
James P. O'Hara |
Kathryn H. Vratil |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 29 Motion for Order ( Titled- Private Settlement Agreement). Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 6/6/2018. Mailed to pro se party Tommie Perris Crawford by regular mail. (ydm) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 20 Motion for Relief; dismissing without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction 25 Mandamus 28 USC [sic] § 1361. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 5/15/2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 60(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., the clerk is directed to enter an amended judgment which dismisses plaintiff's claim set forth in Civil ActionUnder 28 U.S.C. § 2410 (Doc. #1-1) filed January 4, 2018 without prejudice.Mailed to pro se party Tommie Perris Crawford by regular mail. (ydm) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining 4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; overruling as moot 9 Motion for Order; overruling as moot 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 3/14/2018. Plaintiff's complaint dismissed with prejudice. Mailed to pro se party Tommie Perris Crawford by regular mail. (ydm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.