Skerce v. Torgeson Electric Company
Plaintiff: Steve F. Skerce
Defendant: Torgeson Electric Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv02040
Filed: January 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Gwynne E. Birzer
Presiding Judge: Julie A Robinson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 38 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in Part III, supra. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 8/13/19. (ctv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skerce v. Torgeson Electric Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torgeson Electric Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve F. Skerce
Represented By: Aaron C. McKee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?