Bolden v. AT&T Services, Inc.
| Sherrell Bolden |
| AT&T Services, Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company |
| 2:2018cv02306 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Sedgwick |
| John W Lungstrum |
| James P O'Hara |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER re #29 Parties Status Report. The Court has reviewed the status report and orders a follow up Status Report to be filed by 04/15/2020. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/15/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(ses)
|
| Filing 29 Joint STATUS REPORT by Sherrell Bolden. (Mach, Cooper) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the parties shall file a follow-up status report after the conclusion of the arbitration or by October 15, 2019, whichever comes sooner. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/17/2019. (tvn)
|
| Filing 27 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by Sherrell Bolden. (Mach, Cooper) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE by attorney Anne B. Hucker as to AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Hucker, Anne) |
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants AT&T Services, Inc.'s and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's motions to compel arbitration (docs. #13 , #21 ) are granted. The parties are directed to proceed to arbitration of plaintiff's claims. The court will stay the judicial proceedings in this case pending completion of the arbitration process. Counsel for the parties are directed to report to the court in writing no later than Monday, April 15, 2019 concerning the status of that arbitration in the event that it has not been terminated earlier. Failure to so report will lead to dismissal of this case as to these parties for lack of prosecution. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/10/2018. (ses)
|
| Filing 24 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company re: #21 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Case , #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Case (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Sherrell Bolden re #21 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Case , #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Mach, Cooper) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER canceling scheduling conference. In light of the pending motions to compel arbitration and stay proceedings (ECF Nos. 13 and 21), the parties have agreed to postpone the scheduling conference currently set for September 18, 2018. The parties shall submit their planning meeting report and initial disclosures within 14 days of any ruling by the presiding U.S. District Judge, John W. Lungstrum, that denies the pending motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/29/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(srj)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Compel Arbitration , MOTION to Stay Case ( Response deadline 9/12/2018) by Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #18 Amended Complaint by AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.(Boatright, Daniel) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #21 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Case . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(amh) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration #13 and the response deadline is extended to 09/11/2018. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 08/22/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ses)
|
| Pursuant to Order 19 , Set/Reset Deadlines as to #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Case . Response deadline extended to 9/11/2018(ses) |
| Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sherrell Bolden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration by Plaintiff Sherrell Bolden (Egan, Dennis) Linked this Motion to #13 on 8/22/2018 (tvn). |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #17 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(srj) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 unopposed motion to amend complaint. Plaintiff shall file her amended complaint forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/15/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (srj)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Amend Complaint re #1 Complaint (attorney), by Plaintiff Sherrell Bolden (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Giordano Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Dunlap Declaration, #3 Exhibit C - Tuggle Declaration, #4 Exhibit D - Ramirez Declaration, #5 Exhibit E - Nahlik Declaration, #6 Exhibit F - Boatright Declaration, #7 Exhibit G - Tomezsko Declaration)(Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and, MOTION to Stay Case ( Response deadline 8/21/2018) by Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. (Boatright, Daniel) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth W. Gage for AT&T Services, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov/. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/7/18. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sara B. Tomezsko for AT&T Services, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov/. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/7/18. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
|
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Case . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ses) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Kenneth W. Gage to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4548457.) by Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Sara B. Tomezsko to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4548401.) by Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Boatright, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 9/18/2018 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 9/4/2018. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 9/4/2018. All participants must call the conference line at 1-888-363-4749 and enter access code 8914911 for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 7/31/18. (ss)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AT&T Services, Inc. identifying AT&T, Inc. as corporate parent . (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by AT&T Services, Inc..(Boatright, Daniel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree recused. Case reassigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum for all further proceedings. Signed by deputy clerk on 07/05/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(mig)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 7/23/2018 for Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 7/5/2018. (sw) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Sherrell Bolden upon AT&T Services, Inc. served on 6/18/2018, answer due 7/9/2018 (Egan, Dennis) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to AT&T Services, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (tvn) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (tvn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Sherrell Bolden. (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4503809.), filed by Sherrell Bolden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit KHRC CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION, #2 Exhibit KHRC CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION, #3 Exhibit EEOC NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUE)(Egan, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
