Mays v. Crawford County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
| Mary Mays |
| Board of County Commissioners of Crawford County and Crawford County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners |
| 2:2018cv02348 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Crawford |
| K Gary Sebelius |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Mary Mays. (Thornberry, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Mary Mays. (Thornberry, Stephen) Modified on 7/3/2018- Document was originally filed as a blank Civil Cover Sheet. Attorney has been directed to re-file completed form. (sw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4523060.), filed by Mary Mays.(Thornberry, Stephen) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Civil cover sheet filed as an incomplete document. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sw) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
