Smith v. Affiliated Management Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kaleigh Rae Smith
Defendant: Affiliated Management Services, Inc. and Equifax, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv02438
Filed: August 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Crabtree
Referring Judge: Teresa J James
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Kaleigh Rae Smith for Defendant Affiliated Management Services only. (Knipp, Ryan)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Plaintiff has filed a #5 Notice of Settlement with Affiliated Management Services, Inc. which indicates she intends to file a dismissal of Defendant Affiliated Management Services, Inc. within 30 days. Plaintiff shall contact the undersigned Magistrate Judge by email if she is unable to file the stipulation of dismissal by October 25, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 9/14/2018. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ts)
September 13, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT with Affiliated Management Services, Inc. by Kaleigh Rae Smith (Knipp, Ryan)
September 4, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Kaleigh Rae Smith upon Equifax, Inc. served on 8/31/2018, answer due 9/21/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(Knipp, Ryan)
September 4, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Kaleigh Rae Smith upon Affiliated Management Services, Inc. served on 8/30/2018, answer due 9/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(Knipp, Ryan)
August 27, 2018 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Affiliated Management Services, Inc., Equifax, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (tvn)
August 24, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kaleigh Rae Smith. (Knipp, Ryan)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4565261.), filed by Kaleigh Rae Smith.(Knipp, Ryan)
August 24, 2018 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (tvn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Affiliated Management Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaleigh Rae Smith
Represented By: Ryan D. Knipp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Affiliated Management Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?