Oxendine v. Coventya, Inc. et al
| Samara Oxendine |
| Coventya, Inc. and Douglas Vogel |
| 2:2018cv02528 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| James P O'Hara |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Coventya, Inc., Douglas Vogel.(Sholtz, Philip) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Philip Sholtz on behalf of All Defendants. (Sholtz, Philip) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Samara Oxendine. (Scott, Charles) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Coventya, Inc., Douglas Vogel. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Civil cover sheet is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4597623.), filed by Samara Oxendine.(Scott, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
