Abubakar v. MPP CO., INC.
| Angel Abubakar |
| MPP CO., INC. |
| 2:2018cv02541 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
AMENDED ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION re #7 Order on Motion to Compel Arbitration granting #6 Joint MOTION to Compel Arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act and Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed by MPP Co., Inc. Counsel for the parties are directed to report to the court in writing no later than MAY 13, 2019 concerning the status of the arbitration in the event that it has not been terminated earlier. Failure to so report will lead to dismissal of this case as to the parties for lack of prosecution. (Amended order filed to correct date status report is due) Signed by District Judge John W Lungstrum on 11/13/2018. (ses)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION granting #6 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by District Judge John W Lungstrum on 11/13/2018. (ydm)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Compel Arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act and Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Defendant MPP Co., Inc. (McAtee, Carrie) |
| Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/19/18 for Defendant MPP Co., Inc. to answer or otherwise plead Signed by deputy clerk on 11/5/2018. (ca) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Angel Abubakar upon MPP Co., Inc. served on 10/15/2018, answer due 11/5/2018 (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to MPP Co., Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Megan Lowe Stiles on behalf of Angel Abubakar. (Stiles, Megan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Angel Abubakar. (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Angel Abubakar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $400, receipt number AKSDC-460446. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Abubakar v. MPP CO., INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angel Abubakar | |
| Represented By: | Joshua P. Wunderlich |
| Represented By: | Megan Lowe Stiles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MPP CO., INC. | |
| Represented By: | Carrie McAtee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
