John Doe DJ v. United States of America et al
| John Doe DJ |
| United States of America and Mark E. Wisner |
| 2:2018cv02579 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment by Defendant United States of America (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sarah E. Haston, #2 Exhibit - Redacted A, #3 Exhibit - Redacted B, #4 Exhibit C)(Haston, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment by Defendant United States of America. (Haston, Sarah) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mark E. Wisner, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to Attorney for service). (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Carlos Murguia and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff John Doe DJ. (Curry, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4619622.), filed by John Doe DJ.(Curry, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
