Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund et al v. Wasatch Railroad Contractors
John Fultz, Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, Boilermakers National Annuity Trust and Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund |
Wasatch Railroad Contractors |
2:2018cv02601 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kenneth G Gale |
John W Lungstrum |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund, Boilermakers National Annuity Trust, Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz. (Brown, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4630475.), filed by John Fultz, Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund, Boilermakers National Annuity Trust, Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund.(Brown, Scott) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Wasatch Railroad Contractors. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W Lungstrum and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.