Livengood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Livengood
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 2:2018cv02611
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: J Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed - served by Certified Mail (USM-285) on 12/26/2018. Summons served on Office of the Regional Counsel. (ydm)
December 27, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED - Certified Mail (USM-285) served upon Social Security Administration. (ydm)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed - served by Personal Service on 12/13/2018 Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, answer due 2/11/2019. Summons served on United States Attorney. (hw)
December 11, 2018 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to US Marshal for service USM 285) (ca)
December 7, 2018 NOTICE OF DOCKET TEXT MODIFICATION by Deputy Clerk regarding MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Counsel used incorrect event (Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis). Event type and text corrected. (hw)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/3/2018. (sz)
November 15, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Christopher D Livengood. (Stubblefield, Andrea) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2018: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tvn).
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE Access to document is restricted pursuant to the Courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Christopher D Livengood (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Financial Status)(Stubblefield, Andrea) Modified on 12/7/2018 to correct title and event used(hw).
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Christopher D Livengood.(Stubblefield, Andrea)
November 15, 2018 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge J. Thomas Marten for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Livengood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Livengood
Represented By: Andrea S. Stubblefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?