Miller v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Denise Miller
Defendant: Trans Union, LLC and Seterus, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv02705
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Gwynne E Birzer
Referring Judge: Julie A Robinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 4/16/2019 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 4/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 2/11/19. (alm)
February 11, 2019 Filing 15 Defendant Seterus, Inc.'s Original ANSWER to Complaint by Seterus, Inc..(Kapke, George)
February 8, 2019 Filing 14 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Trans Union, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mouber, Bryan)
February 8, 2019 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by Trans Union, LLC.(Mouber, Bryan)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Philip W. Danaher for Seterus, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov/. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 1/25/19. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (rel)
January 24, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for attorney Philip W. Danaher to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4693336.) by Defendant Seterus, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Kapke, George)
January 22, 2019 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Seterus, Inc. identifying Internal Business Machines Corporation as corporate parent . (Kapke, George)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Defendant Seterus, Inc.'s, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Seterus, Inc. answer due 2/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 1/18/19. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (rel)
January 18, 2019 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Seterus, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Kapke, George)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Trans Union, LLC answer due 2/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 1/18/19. (adc)
January 17, 2019 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trans Union, LLC identifying TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. as corporate parent . (Mouber, Bryan)
January 17, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Trans Union, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Mouber, Bryan)
January 15, 2019 Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by George E. Kapke, Jr on behalf of Seterus, Inc.. (Kapke, George)
December 20, 2018 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Denise Miller - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Esselman, Andrew)
December 20, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Denise Miller. (Esselman, Andrew)
December 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4666863.), filed by Denise Miller.(Esselman, Andrew)
December 20, 2018 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
December 20, 2018 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Seterus, Inc., Trans Union, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trans Union, LLC
Represented By: James S. Kreamer
Represented By: Bryan E. Mouber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seterus, Inc.
Represented By: Philip W. Danaher
Represented By: George E. Kapke, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Miller
Represented By: Andrew M. Esselman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?