Ashlock v. Dollar General Corporation et al
Dolly Ashlock |
DG Retail, LLC and Dollar General Corporation |
Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC |
2:2019cv02291 |
June 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Angel D Mitchell |
Julie A Robinson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Civil Case Terminated per #13 Stipulation of Dismissal. (tvn) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Dolly Ashlock. (Atterbury, Tony) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Dolly Ashlock (Atterbury, Tony) |
Filing 11 ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference. The court continues the scheduling conference set for August 14, 2019, and temporarily suspends the deadlines for submission of a proposed scheduling order and exchange of initial disclosures. The court will reset the scheduling conference and related deadlines after counsel for Third-Party Defendant Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC has entered an appearance in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/18/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(bh) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ydm) |
Filing 10 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT by Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs Dollar General Corporation and DG Retail, LLC against Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC, filed by DG Retail, LLC, Dollar General Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Ricke, Kelly) |
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 8/14/2019 at 11:00 AM in Topeka Courtroom 470 (ADM) before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 7/24/2019. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 8/7/2019. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 8/7/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/10/2019. (ht) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Dolly Ashlock upon Dollar General Corporation served on 6/18/2019, answer due 7/9/2019 (Atterbury, Tony) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by DG Retail, LLC identifying Dollar General Corporation as corporate parent (Ricke, Kelly) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dollar General Corporation (Ricke, Kelly) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint , Demand for Jury Trial, and Request for Trial in Topeka, Kansas by DG Retail, LLC, Dollar General Corporation.(Ricke, Kelly) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Kelly A. Ricke on behalf of All Defendants (Ricke, Kelly) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Dolly Ashlock upon DG Retail, LLC served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019 (Atterbury, Tony) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Dolly Ashlock. (Atterbury, Tony) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4834130.), filed by Dolly Ashlock.(Atterbury, Tony) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to DG Retail, LLC, Dollar General Corporation. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.