Ross v. Giambelluca et al
| Floyd E Ross and Floyd Edward Ross, Jr. |
| Samual Giambelluca, Sharp One INC and Sharp One, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02293 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| James P O'Hara |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Floyd Edward Ross, Jr upon Samual Giambelluca served on 6/15/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 (Kopit, Michael) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Floyd Edward Ross, Jr upon Sharp One, Inc. served on 6/15/2019, answer due 7/8/2019 (Kopit, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4836098.), filed by Floyd Edward Ross, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Kopit, Michael) Modified filer behind the scenes and in docket text on 7/2/2019 (tvn). |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Samual Giambelluca, Sharp One, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
