Vitt v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Latrissa K. Vitt |
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
Social Security Regional Administrator |
2:2019cv02337 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Carlos Murguia |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (issued to Attorney for service) (ca) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: On June 17, 2019, Andrew M. Saul replaced Nancy A. Berryhill as the Commissioner of Social Security. The party text for the defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of has been updated to reflect this change. (hw) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Latrissa K. Vitt. (Green, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4846423.), filed by Latrissa K. Vitt.(Green, James) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Carlos Murguia for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.