Lawson v. USD 500 Kansas City, Kansas
Michele Lawson |
Kansas City Kansas Public Schools USD 500 and USD 500 Kansas City, Kansas |
2:2019cv02344 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
James P O'Hara |
Julie A Robinson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to USD 500 Kansas City, Kansas. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Place of Trial by Michele Lawson (Murphy, Phillip) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Michele Lawson. (Murphy, Phillip) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4848245.), filed by Michele Lawson.(Murphy, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.