Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust et al v. Becker Boiler Co., Inc.
John Fultz and Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust |
Becker Boiler Co., Inc. |
2:2019cv02346 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Carlos Murguia |
James P O'Hara |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, John Fultz. Becker Boiler Co., Inc. waiver sent on 7/31/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Gregorio, Neil) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, John Fultz. (Gregorio, Neil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4849115.), filed by Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, John Fultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Gregorio, Neil) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Carlos Murguia and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Becker Boiler Co., Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.