State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Broan-NuTone, LLC
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
Broan-NuTone, LLC |
2:2019cv02493 |
August 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Angel D Mitchell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Broan-NuTone, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 7 Defendants ANSWER to Complaint by Broan-NuTone, LLC.(Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Broan-NuTone, LLC identifying Nortek, Inc. as corporate parent . (Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal by Broan-NuTone, LLC. (Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Brett C. Randol on behalf of Broan-NuTone, LLC. (Randol, Brett) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Broan-NuTone, LLC . (Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Broan-NuTone, LLC. (Starrett, Frederick) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Johnson County District Court, case number 19CV03778 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4898367.), filed by Broan-NuTone, LLC.(Starrett, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.