Erickson v. Haz-Mat Response, Inc.
| Austin Erickson |
| Haz-Mat Response, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02551 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Camille L. Roe on behalf of Haz-Mat Response, Inc.. (Roe, Camille) |
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2019 at 10:00 AM in KC Courtroom 236 (TJJ) before Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 11/27/2019. Completed Report of Parties' Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 12/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/4/2019. (mn)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Haz-Mat Response, Inc..(Russell, Kyle) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Out of Time. Defendant is granted leave to file its answer or other response to Plaintiff's Complaint out of time and shall file such answer or response on or before November 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 10/22/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mn)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION FOR LEAVE to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint Out of Time by Defendant Haz-Mat Response, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Russell, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Austin Erickson upon Haz-Mat Response, Inc. served on 9/16/2019, answer due 10/7/2019 (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Haz-Mat Response, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (gw) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Austin Erickson. (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4917531.), filed by Austin Erickson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (gw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Erickson v. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Haz-Mat Response, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kyle B. Russell |
| Represented By: | Camille L. Roe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Austin Erickson | |
| Represented By: | Joshua P. Wunderlich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
