ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Scardina
ConvergeOne, Inc. |
Paul Scardina |
2:2019cv02565 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Angel D Mitchell |
Julie A Robinson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice by ConvergeOne, Inc.. (Murray, Casey) |
***Civil Case Terminated per JAR chambers pursuant to #11 Stipulation of Dismissal.(heo) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support by Plaintiff ConvergeOne, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Murray, Casey) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to Answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by October 22, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/7/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (bh) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Paul Scardina (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 7 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 10/08/2019 for Defendant Paul Scardina to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 09/23/2019. (ca) |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #4 MOTION to Transfer Case. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(bh) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Paul Scardina - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #4 MOTION to Transfer Case by Defendant Paul Scardina (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case by Defendant Paul Scardina (Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal (Certificate of Filing of Notice of Removal) by Paul Scardina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Paul Scardina. (Thomas, Henry) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Johnson, case number 19CV04431 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4922563.), filed by Paul Scardina. (Attachments: #1 State Court Petition Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Thomas, Henry) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Scardina | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ConvergeOne, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Casey P. Murray |
Represented By: | J. Nick Badgerow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Paul Scardina | |
Represented By: | Henry J. Thomas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.