Wilson et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
| Ronald Wilson and Leisa Wilson |
| Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02570 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2019 at 02:30 PM in KC Courtroom 643 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 11/27/2019. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 12/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/23/2019. (ht)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ethicon, Inc. identifying Johnson & Johnson as corporate parent . (Mouber, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Ethicon, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mouber, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Ethicon, Inc..(Mouber, Bryan) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Johnson & Johnson, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent . (Mouber, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Johnson & Johnson, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mouber, Bryan) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Johnson & Johnson, Inc..(Mouber, Bryan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - On October 2, 2019, the court ordered plaintiffs to show cause why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the Complaint failed to establish that diversity of citizenship exists here. Doc. #3 . On October 11, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Response to the court's show cause order. Doc. #4 . The Response sufficiently establishes the citizenship of each defendant in this case. And the court finds that plaintiffs now have alleged facts sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Plaintiffs thus have shown good cause why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 10/15/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(mig)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE re #3 Order to Show Cause, by Plaintiffs Leisa Wilson, Ronald Wilson(Gunn, Amy) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiffs Leisa WIlson and Ronald WIlson are directed to show cause with 14 days why the court should not dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 10/2/19. (hw) Modified to add docket text on 10/7/2019 (hw).
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Leisa Wilson, Ronald Wilson. (Gunn, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4923238.), filed by Leisa Wilson, Ronald Wilson.(Gunn, Amy) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
