Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Eye Works, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: John Fultz and Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant: Eye Works, Inc. and Cheryl Gibson
Case Number: 2:2019cv02572
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: James P O'Hara
Referring Judge: Julie A Robinson
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.(ca)
November 14, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by All Plaintiffs with Prejudice (Kakazu, Nathan)
October 17, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant to File an Answer by Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz. (Kakazu, Nathan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz upon Cheryl Gibson served on 9/27/2019, answer due 10/18/2019 (Kakazu, Nathan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz upon Eye Works, Inc. served on 9/27/2019, answer due 10/18/2019 (Kakazu, Nathan)
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz. (Kakazu, Nathan)
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4923980.), filed by Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund, John Fultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kakazu, Nathan)
September 18, 2019 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Eye Works, Inc., Cheryl Gibson. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca)
September 18, 2019 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Eye Works, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Fultz
Represented By: Nathan A. Kakazu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund
Represented By: Nathan A. Kakazu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eye Works, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?