James Hernandez v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
| James Hernandez |
| JUUL Labs, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02634 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Teresa J James |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case electronically opened in California Northern District (19-7387). (hw) |
| Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-6). Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of California (MDL 2913), ***Terminating Case. (hw) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern California (MDL 2913).(hw) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Petition. Defendant's answer or other response to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be due 30 days after the JPML's ruling on the pending motion to consolidate and transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 10/28/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mn)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by James Hernandez upon JUUL Labs, Inc. served on 10/16/2019, answer due 11/6/2019 (Hudson, Tyler) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Bennett, James) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by James F. Bennett on behalf of JUUL Labs, Inc. (Bennett, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff James Hernandez, as Parent and as Guardian of his Minor Child, J.H.. (Cartmell, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4949370.), filed by James Hernandez, as Parent and as Guardian of his Minor Child, J.H..(Cartmell, Thomas) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to JUUL Labs, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (gw) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (gw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James Hernandez v. JUUL Labs, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James F. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Hernandez | |
| Represented By: | Thomas P. Cartmell |
| Represented By: | Kirk J. Goza |
| Represented By: | Jonathan P. Kieffer |
| Represented By: | Tyler W. Hudson |
| Represented By: | Bradley D. Honnold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
