Hunter et al v. MFT - MFT - KC Enterprises Limited Partnership et al
| Jaylisa Hunter and Alyssa Gunn |
| MFT - KC Enterprises Limited Partnership and Jack in the Box, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02650 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jack in the Box, Inc., MFT - KC Enterprises Limited Partnership. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Alyssa Gunn, Jaylisa Hunter. (McKee, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4956842.), filed by Jaylisa Hunter, Alyssa Gunn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Redacted A - EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Exhibit - Redacted C - EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #4 Exhibit D - EEOC Notice of Right to Sue)(McKee, Aaron) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Carlos Murguia and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
